Importance The research evaluates the State intervention in the economy of the Russian Federation. Objectives The research summarizes fragmented data in publicly available sources to build the body of knowledge and subsequently understand how business and the State relate, and forecast the further development and implications for businesses. Methods Using econometric and statistical methods, I analyzed aspects reflecting how the crisis influences the extent to which the State intervenes into the Russian economy. Results The article presents analytical information on indicators of the State’s interference into the Russian economy, and identifies possible development trends. Conclusions and Relevance The economic rationale for privatization is disputable during the restructuring process. The article mentions some reasons for that. There is a disparity between demand for public assets and their supply. It generally means that the State intends to have its assets privatized and replenish its budget during its acute deficit, rather than sell the assets at their highest value, thus increasing the efficiency of property management. The results apply to researches of students, post-graduates, teachers and managers in public institutions, profit-making and professional organizations.
Kondrat'ev V.B. [The State intervention in the economy: historical and contemporary context of the issue]. Menedzhment i biznes-administrirovanie = Management and Business Administration,2014, no. 2, pp. 38–53. (In Russ.)
Shmelev N. [Modernizing the economy: imperatives of the State intervention]. Svobodnaya mysl' = Free Thought,2010, no. 2, pp. 15–26. (In Russ.)
Rodionova D. [Innovative development as a strategic priority of the State intervention in modernization of complicated regions’ economies]. Finansovye issledovaniya = Financial Research,2011, no. 2, pp. 63–69. (In Russ.)
Dikinov A.Kh., Kumalov B.Kh., Kushkhov A.A. [Priorities of the State intervention in economy in reforming the property relations at the current stage]. Izvestiya Kabardino-Balkarskogo nauchnogo tsentra RAN = Bulletin of the Kabardino-Balkar Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences,2011, no. 6, pp. 147–151. (In Russ.)
Akulov A.O. [Socio-economic results of the State intervention in Russia’s economy]. Zhurnal ekonomicheskoi teorii = Russian Journal of Economic Theory, 2012, no. 1, pp. 7–15. (In Russ.)
Khubiev K.A. [The extent and quality of the State intervention in economy as part of dirigisme and liberalism alternatives]. Filosofiya khozyaistva = Philosophy of Economy,2012, no. 2, pp. 14–28. (In Russ.)
Pogudaeva M.Yu. [Transformation of the concept of the State intervention in economy during the extension of industrial liberalism]. Ekonomicheskie nauki = Economic Sciences,2008, no. 39, pp. 50–52. (In Russ.)
Glukhareva L.I., Timina E.I. [The State intervention in the formation of the society based on the knowledge economy]. Vestnik RGGU. Seriya: Ekonomika. Upravlenie. Pravo = RSUH/RGGU Bulletin. Economics. Management. Law,2010, no. 14, pp. 40–53. (In Russ.)
Shmelev N.P. [Imperatives of the State intervention in modernizing Russia’s economy]. Nauchnye trudy Vol'nogo ekonomicheskogo obshchestva Rossii = Proceedings of the Free Economic Society of Russia,2010, vol. 134, pp. 149–161. (In Russ.)
Larionova I.V. [Areas for improving the performance of State-owned banks]. Bankovskie uslugi = Banking Services,2015, no. 1, pp. 20–26. (In Russ.)
Ol'khova R.G. [Social purpose of State-owned banks’ activities]. Bankovskie uslugi = Banking Services,2015, no. 1, pp. 28–35. (In Russ.)
Dolgopyatova T.G. [Public property: privatization vs. effective management]. Zhurnal Novoi ekonomicheskoi assotsiatsii = Journal of New Economic Association,2015, no. 1, pp. 178–183. (In Russ.)
Mokina L.S., Nikitina E.G. [The need for governmental control over economy]. Vestnik Samarskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta = Vestnik of Samara State University,2015, no. 2, pp. 153–157. (In Russ.)
Chilimova T.A., Ivanitskii V.P. [Efficacy of interface of the State and corporations in developing the innovative economy]. Vestnik Omskogo universiteta. Seriya: Ekonomika = Herald of Omsk University. Series: Economics,2015, no. 3, pp. 296–301. (In Russ.)
Nagalin V.Yu. [Public entrepreneurship and economic growth]. Vestnik Instituta ekonomiki Rossijskoj akademii nauk,2016, no. 1, pp. 198–204. (In Russ.)
Devyatkina V.V. [Public entrepreneurship as an innovative form of the government–business interface]. Finansovaya ekonomika = Financial Economy,2014, no. 4, pp. 37–42. (In Russ.)
Tyukavkin N.M. [Issues of governmental control over economy of the regional economic agents]. Osnovy ekonomiki, upravleniya i prava = Fundamentals of Economics, Management and Law,2014, no. 2, pp. 8–10. (In Russ.)
Steinberg D.A., Saideman S.M. Laissez Fear: Assessing the Impact of Government Involvement in the Economy on Ethnic Violence. International Studies Quarterly, 2008, vol. 52, iss. 2, p. 235. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2478.2008.00500.x
