+7 925 966 4690, 9am6pm (GMT+3), Monday – Friday
ÈÄ «Ôèíàíñû è êðåäèò»

JOURNALS

  

FOR AUTHORS

  

SUBSCRIBE

    
Financial Analytics: Science and Experience
 

Two generations of fiscal federalism: interconnection within the development process

Vol. 8, Iss. 18, MAY 2015

PDF  Article PDF Version

Available online: 21 May 2015

Subject Heading: SCHOLAR DISPUTE

JEL Classification: 

Pages: 42-59

Peshina E.V. Ural State University of Economics, Yekaterinburg, Russian Federation
peshina@yandex.ru

Strekalova A.A. Ural State University of Economics, Yekaterinburg, Russian Federation
strekalova@usue.ru

Importance The article explores issues of the first and the second generations of fiscal federalism in foreign economic thought. It carries out a retrospective analysis of proceedings by foreign economists who significantly contributed to the formation of the first generation of fiscal federalism that is based on neoclassical economics, and, particularly, such theories as public choice theory, theory of public finance, economic theory of clubs, Tiebout's theory.
     Objectives The article substantiates the emergence and development of scientific thought on forming the second generation of fiscal federalism within the framework of the new institutional economics and new political economy. The research studies microeconomic theories (theory of the firm, agency, incomplete contracts, transaction cost) that constituted the basis of neo-institutionalism, being laid down into the formation and development of the second generation of federalism.
     Methods The research validates the first and the second generations of fiscal federalism do not compete, but complement each other. The theory of the second generation of fiscal federalism is intended to study and identify incentives, motivation mechanisms that underlie actions of political officials at various levels of public/municipal administration under fiscal decentralization.
     Results We formulate the concepts and provisions, which may be laid down into the construction of the second generation of fiscal federalism (concept of intergovernmental relations, concept of interstate management, the public as the fourth subject of federalism) voiced by foreign scientists. The final part of the research concludes on distinctive characteristics of the first and the second generations of fiscal federalism.
     Conclusions and Relevance The article should compensate for the lack of translated scientific works on the first and the second generation of fiscal federalism in Russia.

Keywords: first generation, fiscal federalism, second generation, decentralization, fiscal policy

References:

  1. Buchanan J.M. Izbrannye trudy. Ser. ‘Nobelevskie laureaty po ekonomike’. T.1 [The Collected Works. The Nobel Prize Winners Series. Vol. 1]. Moscow, Taurus Al'fa Publ., 1997, 482 p.
  2. Dobrynin N.M. Rossiiskii federalizm: genezis, evolyutsiya: izbrannye publikatsii. V dvukh tomakh [The Russian federalism: genesis, evolution: the collected publications. Two volumes]. Novosibirsk, Nauka Publ., 2008, vol. 2, 494 p.
  3. Zhuravskaya E., Makrushin A., Slin'ko I. Prichiny vozniknoveniya plokhikh byudzhetnykh stimulov [Reasons for emergence of bad budgetary incentives]. Available at: Link. (In Russ.)
  4. Coase R. Firma, rynok i pravo: sbornik statei [The firm, market and law: a collection of articles]. Moscow, Novoe izdatel'stvo Publ., 2007, 224 p.
  5. Musgrave R.A., Musgrave P.B. Gosudarstvennye finansy: teoriya i praktika [Public Finance in Theory and Practice]. Moscow, Biznes Atlas Publ., 2009, 716 p.
  6. Furubotn E.G., Richter R. Instituty i ekonomicheskaya teoriya. Dostizheniya novoi institutsional'noi ekonomicheskoi teorii [Institutions and Economic Theory: The Contribution of the New Institutional Economics]. St. Petersburg, Saint Petersburg State University Publ., 2005, 736 p.
  7. Anderson W. Intergovernmental Relations in Review. Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press, 1960, 178 p.
  8. Alesina A., Rodrik D. Distributive Politics and Economic Growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1994, no. 109(2), pp. 465–490.
  9. Arrow K.J. Price-quantity Adjustments in Multiple Markets with Rising Demands. In: Arrow K.J., Karlin S., Suppes P. Mathematical Models in the Social Sciences, 1959. Proceedings of the first Stanford symposium, Stanford mathematical studies in the social sciences, IV. Stanford, California, Stanford University Press, 1960, pp. 3–15.
  10. Arrow K.J. The Organization of Economic Activity: Issues Pertinent to the Choice of Market versus Non-market Allocation. Joint Economic Committee of 91st Congress, 1969, 16 ð. Available at: Link summary?doi=10.1.1.324.971.
  11. Bardhan P. Decentralization of Governance and Development. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2002, no. 16(4), pp. 185–205.
  12. Besley T., Case A. Incumbent Behavior: Vote-Seeking, Tax-Setting, and Yardstick Competition. American Economic Review, 1995, no. 85, pp. 25–45.
  13. Bingham L.B., Nabatchi T., O’Leary R. The New Governance: Practices and Processes for Stakeholder and Citizen Participation in the Work of Government. Public Administration Review, 2005, vol. 65, no. 5, pp. 547–558.
  14. Bird R.M. Fiscal Federalism. In: The Encyclopedia of Taxation and Tax Policy. 2nd edition. Edited by Cordes J.J., Ebel R.D., Gravelle J.G. Urban Institute Press, 518 p. Available at: Link.
  15. Bolton P., Roland G. The Breakup of Nations: A Political Economy Analysis. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1997, no. 112, pp. 1057–1090.
  16. Break G.F. Financing Government in a Federal System. Washington, D.C., The Brookings Institution, 1980, 276 ð.
  17. Buchanan J.M. An Economic Theory of Clubs. Economica. New Series, 1965, vol. 32, no. 125, pp. 1–14. Available at: Link.
  18. Carboni G.G. Fiscal Federalism and Comparative Law. Comparative Law Review, 2014, vol. 5, 20 ð. Available at: Link comparative/article/view/29/27.
  19. Casella A., Frey Br. Federalism and Clubs: Towards an Economic Theory of Overlapping Political Jurisdictions. European Economic Review, 1992, no. 36, pp. 639–646. Available at: Link.pdf.
  20. Chandra J.P. Theory of Fiscal Federalism: An Analysis. Amity University. MPRA Paper, 2013, no. 41769, 33 ð. Available at: Link.
  21. Cremer J., Estache A., Seabright P. Decentralizing Public Services: What Can We Learn from the Theory of the Firm? Revue d’Economie Politique, 1996, no. 106, pp. 37–60.
  22. Congleton R.D., Kyriacou À., Bacaria J. A Theory of Menu Federalism: Decentralization by Political Agreement. Constitutional Political Economy, 2003, no. 14, pp. 167–190. Available at: Link.
  23. Ñornes R., Sandler T. The Theory of Externalities, Public Goods, and Club Goods. Business & Economics. Cambridge University Press, 1996, 590 p.
  24. Frey B.S., Stutzer À. The Use of Happiness Research for Public Policy. June 12, 2011, 20 ð. Available at: Link Stutzer_HappinessPolicy_SC%26W_June2011.pdf.
  25. Furubotn E.G., Richter R. Institutions and Economic Theory: The Contribution of the New Institutional Economics. Ann Arbor, The University of Michigan Press, 1998.
  26. Gamble À. The New Political Economy. Political Studies, 1995, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 516–530. Available at: Link.
  27. Garzarelli G. Old and New Theories of Fiscal Federalism, Organizational Design Problems, and Tiebout. Journal of Public Finance and Public Choice, 2004, XXII, 1–2.
  28. Gordon R. An Optimal Tax Approach to Fiscal Federalism. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1983, no. 98(4), pp. 567–586.
  29. Grossman S.J., Hart O.S. The Costs and Benefits of Ownership: A Theory of Vertical and Lateral Integration. Journal of Political Economy, 1986, August, pp. 691–719. Available at: Link.
  30. Johnson R.N., Libecap G.D. Transactions Costs and Coalition Stability under Majority Rule. Economic Inquiry, 2003, no. 41, pp. 193–207.
  31. Hayek F.A. The Use of Knowledge in Society. American Economic Review, 1945, XXXV, no. 4, pp. 519–530. Available at: Link.
  32. Holmstrom B., Tirole Î. Transfer Pricing and Organizational Form. The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 1991, no. 7(2), pp. 201–228. Available at: Link.
  33. Hunter J.S.H. Federalism and Fiscal Balance. Canberra, Australian National University Press, 1977, 271 ð.
  34. Inman R.P., Rubinfeld D.L. Rethinking Federalism. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 1997, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 43–64. Available at: Link 10.1257/jep.11.4.43.
  35. Inman R.P. Transfers and Bailouts: Enforcing Local Fiscal Discipline with Lessons from U.S. Federalism. In: J. Rodden et al. Fiscal Decentralization and the Challenge of Hard Budget Constraints. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press, 2003, pp. 35–83.
  36. Inman R.P., Rubinfeld D.L. Federal Institutions and the Democratic Transition: Learning from South Africa. The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 2011, no. 27, pp. 1–35.
  37. Kettl D.F. The Fourth Face of Federalism. Public Administration Review, 1981, pp. 41(3), pp. 366–371.
  38. King D.N. Fiscal Tiers: the Economics of Multi-level Government. London, George Allen & Unwin, 1984, 326 p.
  39. Kornai J., Maskin E., Roland G. Understanding the Soft Budget Constraint. Journal of Economic Literature, 2003, vol. 41, iss. 4, pp. 1095–1136.
  40. Knight B. Parochial Interests and the Centralized Provision of Local Public Goods: Evidence from Congressional Voting on Transportation Projects. Journal of Public Economics, 2004, no. 88(3-4), pp. 845–866.
  41. Levaggi R. Decentralized Budgeting Procedures for Public Expenditure. Public Finance Review, 2002, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 273–295.
  42. Lockwood B. Inter-Regional Insurance. Journal of Public Economics, 1999, vol. 72, iss. 1, pp. 1–37.
  43. McLure Ch.E.Jr. Vertical Fiscal Imbalance and the Assignment of Taxing Powers in Australia. Stanford, Hoover Institution on War, Revolution and Peace, 1993, 26 ð.
  44. Milgrom Ð., Roberts J. Economics, Organization and Management. Prentice Hall, 1 edition, February 11, 1992, 621 ð.
  45. Musgrave R.A. The Voluntary Exchange Theory of Public Economy. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1939, vol. 53, no 2, pp. 213–237. Available at: Link.
  46. Musgrave R.A. A Multiple Theory of Budget Determination. Finanzarchiv, N.F, 17, 1956/1957, Heft 3. Available at: Link.
  47. Musgrave R.A. The Theory of Public Finance. New York, McGraw Hill, 1959, 628 ð.
  48. Myerson R.B. Federalism and Incentives for Success of Democracy. Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 2006, no. 1, pp. 3–23.
  49. Oates W.E. Fiscal Federalism. New York, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1972, 256 ð.
  50. Oates W.E. Studies in Fiscal Federalism. Aldershot, Hants, England, E. Elgar Publishing Ltd, 1991, 455 p.
  51. Oates W.E. The Theory of Fiscal Federalism: Revenue and Expenditure Issues – A Survey of Recent Theoretical and Empirical Research. Public Finance with Several Levels of Government, edited by Remy Prud’homme (1–18). The Hague/Koeningstein. Foundation Journal of Public Finance, 1991.
  52. Oates W.E. The Economics of Fiscal Federalism and Local Finance. Northampton, MA, Edward Elgar Publishing, 1998.
  53. Oates W.E. An Essay on Fiscal Federalism. Journal of Economic Literature, 1999, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 1120–1149. Available at: Link.
  54. Oates W.E. Fiscal Federalism and the European Union: Some Reflections. Societa Italiana di Economia Pubblica, Pavia University, October 4–5, 2002, pp. 36–57. Available at: Link.
  55. Oates W.E. Toward a Second-Generation Theory of Fiscal Federalism. International Tax and Public Finance, 2005, no. 12, pp. 349–373. Available at: Link.
  56. Oates W.E. On The Evolution of Fiscal Federalism: Theory and Institutions. National Tax Journal, 2008, vol. LXI, no. 2, pp. 313–334. Available at: Link.
  57. Persson T., Tabellini G. Federal Fiscal Constitutions: Risk Sharing and Moral Hazard. Econometrica, 1996, no. 64(3), pp. 623–646.
  58. Pressman J.L., Wildavsky A. Implementation. Barkley and Los Angeles, University of California Press, 1973.
  59. Qian Y., Weingast B.R. Federalism as a Commitment to Preserving Market Incentives. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 1997, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 83–92. Available at: Link.
  60. Rodden J., Wibbles E. Beyond the Fiction of Federalism: Macroeconomic Management in Multitiered Systems. World Politics, 2002, vol. 54, iss. 4, pp. 494–531.
  61. Ross S.A. The Economic Theory of Agency: The Principal's Problem. American Economic Review, 1973, no. 62(2), pp. 134–139. Available at: Link 63.2.134-139.pdf.
  62. Saburov E., Tipenko N., Cherniavskii A. Budget Federalism and Interbudgetary Relations. Problems of Economic Transition, 2001, vol. 43, no. 11, pp. 76–92. Available at: Link.
  63. Samuelson P.A. The Pure Theory of Public Expenditure. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 1954, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 387–389. Available at: Link. (In Russ.)
  64. Sapru R.K. Public Policy: Art and Craft of Policy Analysis. 2/E. New-Delhi, Learning Private Limited, 2011, 369 p.
  65. Seabright P. Accountability and Decentralization in Government: An Incomplete Contract Model. European Economic Review, 1996, no. 40(1), pp. 61–89.
  66. Sinn H.-W. The Selection Principle and Market Failure in Systems Competition. Journal of Public Economic, 1997, vol. 66, iss. 2, pp. 247–274.
  67. Snider C.F. County and Township Government in 1935–1936. American Political Science Review, 1937, vol. 31, pp. 909–916.
  68. Stiglitz J.E. Principal and Agent. From The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics. First Edition, 1987. Available at: Link jstiglitz/download/papers/1987_PrincipalandAgent.pdf.
  69. Tiebout C.M. A Pure Theory of Local Expenditures. The Journal of Political Economy, 1956, vol. 64, no. 5, pp. 416–424.
  70. Thiessen U. Analysis of Contemporary Budget Federalism Models based on Economic and Social Effectiveness of Inter-budgetary Relations. Theory, Experiences in OECD countries, and Analysis for Russia. Russian-European Centre for Economic Policy (RECEP). Moscow, 2005, 37 ð. Available at: Link.
  71. Tommasi M., Jones M., Sanguinetti P. Politics, Institutions and Fiscal Performance in a Federal System: An Analysis of the Argentine Provinces. Journal of Development Economics, 2000, no. 61(2), pp. 305–333.
  72. Tommasi M., Weinschelbaum F. Centralization vs. Decentralization: A Principal-Agent Analysis, 2003. Unpublished paper. Available at: Link.
  73. Weingast B.R. Second Generation Fiscal Federalism: Implications for Decentralized Democratic Governance and Economic Development. Initiative for Policy Dialogue, 2007, September, 71 ð. Available at: Link.
  74. Weingast B.R. Second Generation Fiscal Federalism: The Implications of Fiscal Incentives. Journal of Urban Economics, 2009, no. 65(3), pp. 279–293.
  75. Weingast B.R. Second Generation Fiscal Federalism: Political Aspects of Decentralization and Economic Development. World Development, 2014, vol. 53, pp. 14–25. Available at: Link.
  76. Wildasin D.E. Urban Public Finance. Psychology Press, 1986, 175 ð.
  77. Wildasin D.E. Income Redistribution in a Common Labor Market. American Economic Review, 1991, no. 81, pp. 757–774.
  78. Wildasin D.E. The Institutions of Federalism: Toward an Analytical Framework. National Tax Journal, 2004, no. 57, pp. 247–272.
  79. Williamson O.E. The Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firms, Markets, Relational Contracting. New York, Free Press, 1985, 450 p. Available at: Link~ langlois/Williamson%20(1985),%20chapter%201.pdf.
  80. Wilson J.D., Wildasin D.E. Capital Tax Competition: Bane or Boon. Journal of Public Economics, 2004, vol. 88, iss. 6, pp. 1065–1091.
  81. Zai P. The Economic Crisis and Fiscal Trends in EU Member States. Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences, 2012, no. 35, pp. 256–268. Available at: Link.

View all articles of issue

 

ISSN 2311-8768 (Online)
ISSN 2073-4484 (Print)

Journal current issue

Vol. 17, Iss. 1
March 2024

Archive