Omonov Zh.K.Ural Federal University named after the First President of Russia B.N. Yeltsin, Yekaterinburg, Russian Federation jomaomon@gmail.com
Importance This article focuses on developing tools to measure an impact of social innovation, taking into account commercial and social benefits of introducing social innovation. Objectives We aim to develop our own matrix for the evaluation of the impact of social innovation. Methods We use methods of systematization, logical analysis, regression analysis, etc. Results The article shows possible areas of institutional development that ensure the effective performance of social and innovation activities, including the development of both efficient formal institutions and social capital. Conclusions and Relevance The theoretical analysis, as well as the results of the application of the developed assessment matrix of social innovation at the regional level, have made it possible to identify the characteristics of social innovation. The matrix makes it possible to identify the characteristics of social innovation functioning in a given territory and also becomes an initial stage for the institutional development directions.
Keywords: social innovation, performance matrix, effective development, institutional environment
References:
Moore M.-L., Westley F.R. Public Sector Policy and Strategies for Facilitating Social Innovation. Horizons: Innovative Communities, Agents of Change, 2011, vol. 11, iss. 1, pp. 1–11. URL: Link
Murray R., Caulier-Grice J., Mulgan G. The Open Book of Social Innovation. The Young Foundation, 2010, 224 p. URL: Link
Moulaert F., MacCallum D., Mehmood D., Hamdouch A. (Eds). General Introduction: The Return of Social Innovation as a Scientific Concept and a Social Practice. The International Handbook on Social Innovation: Collective Action, Social Learning and Transdisciplinary Research. 2013, pp. 1–6. URL: Link doi: Link
Nicholls A., Ziegler R. An Extended Social Grid Model for the Study of Marginalization Processes and Social Innovation. CRESSI Working Papers, 2014, no. 2/2015, pp. 1–13. URL: Link
Pol E., Ville S. Social innovation: Buzz Word or Enduring Term? The Journal of Socio-Economics, 2009, vol. 38, iss. 6, pp. 878–885. URL: Link
Chalmers D. Social Innovation: An Exploration of the Barriers Faced by Innovating Organizations in the Social Economy. Local Economy, 2012, vol. 28, iss. 1, pp. 17–34. URL: Link
Heiscala R. Social Innovations: Structural and Power Perspectives. In: Social Innovations, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Edward Elgar Publishing, 2007, pp. 52–79.
Minks M. Social Innovation : New Solutions to Social Problems. Georgetown University Washington, D.C., April 11, 2011, 80 p. URL: Link
Phills J., Deiglmeier K., Miller D. Rediscovering Social Innovation. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 2008, no. 6, pp. 33–43. URL: Link
Amable B. Institutional Complementarity and Diversity of Social Systems of Innovation and Production. Discussion Paper FS I 99-309, Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung, 1999, 36 p. URL: Link
Battistella C., Nonino F. Open Innovation Web-Based Platforms: The Impact of Different Forms of Motivation on Collaboration. Innovation: Management, Policy & Practice, 2012, vol. 14, iss. 4, pp. 557–575. URL: Link
Koch P., Hauknes J. On Innovation in the Public Sector. NIFU STEP, Oslo, 2005, 102 p. URL: Link
Sang M., Hwang T., Choi D. Open Innovation in the Public Sector of Leading Countries. Management Decision, 2012, 22 p. URL: Link doi: 10.1108/00251741211194921
Popov E., Stoffers J., Omonov Z., Veretennikova A. Analysis of Civic Initiatives: Multiparameter Classification of Social Innovations. American Journal of Applied Science, 2016, vol. 13, iss. 11, pp. 1136–1148. URL: Link
Sachs J.D. The End of Poverty: Economic Possibilities for Our Time. New York, The Penguin Press, 2005, 448 p.
Boettke P.J., Rathbone A. Civil Society, Social Entrepreneurship, and Economic Calculation: Towards a Political Economy of the Philanthropic Enterprise. In: Working Paper 8, The Philanthropic Enterprise, 2002, 26 p. URL: Link
Prahalad C.K. The Fortune at the Bottom of the Pyramid: Eradicating Poverty through Profits. Revised Edition. Wharton School Publishing, 2004, 423 p.
Simanis E., Hart S. The Base of the Pyramid Protocol: Toward Next Generation BoP Strategy. Center for Sustainable Global Enterprise, Johnson School of Management Cornell University, Ithaca, 2008, 57 p. URL: Link
Menyashev R., Polishchuk L. Does Social Capital Have Economic Payoff in Russia? Moscow, HSE Publ., 2011, 44 p. URL: Link
Fafchamps M. Development and Social Capital. Journal of Development Studies, 2006, vol. 42, iss. 7, pp. 1180–1198. URL: Link
Dorward A., Kydd J., Morrison J., Poulton C. Institutions, Markets and Economic Co-ordination: Linking Development Policy to Theory and Praxis. Development and Change, 2003, vol. 36, iss. 1, pp. 1–25.
Mulgan G. The Process of Social Innovation. Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization, 2006, vol. 1, iss. 2, pp. 145–162. URL: Link doi: 10.1162/itgg.2006.1.2.145
Lettice F., Parekh M. The Social Innovation Process: Themes, Challenges and Implications for Practice. International Journal of Technology Management, 2010, vol. 51, iss. 1, pp. 139–158. URL: Link
Young D.R., Lecy J.D. Defining the Universe of Social Enterprise: Competing Metaphors. Voluntas, 2014, vol. 25, iss. 5, pp. 1307–1332. URL: Link
Tirole J. Market Power and Regulation. Economic Sciences Prize Committee of the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, 2014, 54 p. URL: Link
Menard C. The Economics of Hybrid Organizations. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 2004, vol. 160, pp. 345–376. URL: Link
Cressey P., Totterdill P., Exton R., Terstriep J. Stimulating, Resourcing and Sustaining Social Innovation: Towards a New Mode of Public Policy Production and Implementation. SIMPACT Working Paper Series, 2015, vol. 3.
Tambovtsev V.L. [The State as Initiator of Development of Civil Society]. Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost' = Social Sciences and Contemporary World, 2007, no. 2, pp. 69–77. URL: Link (In Russ.)
