+7 925 966 4690, 9am6pm (GMT+3), Monday – Friday
ИД «Финансы и кредит»

JOURNALS

  

FOR AUTHORS

  

SUBSCRIBE

    
Economic Analysis: Theory and Practice
 

Profitability of chemical industry enterprises in the turbulent economy: Modeling by form of ownership

Vol. 17, Iss. 9, SEPTEMBER 2018

PDF  Article PDF Version

Received: 17 July 2018

Received in revised form: 27 July 2018

Accepted: 9 August 2018

Available online: 28 September 2018

Subject Heading: ECONOMIC ADVANCEMENT

JEL Classification: C5, F23, G32, L65, O14

Pages: 1604–1621

https://doi.org/10.24891/ea.17.9.1604

Spitsyn V.V. National Research Tomsk Polytechnic University (TPU), Tomsk, Russian Federation
spitsin_vv@mail.ru

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8360-7590

Trifonov A.Yu. National Research Tomsk Polytechnic University (TPU), Tomsk, Russian Federation
atrifonov@tpu.ru

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6959-4183

Ryzhkova M.V. Tomsk State University (TSU), Tomsk, Russian Federation
marybox@inbox.ru

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0107-8016

Spitsyna L.Yu. National Research Tomsk Polytechnic University (TPU), Tomsk, Russian Federation
s_luba_07@mail.ru

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3923-984X

Importance The article considers the efficiency (profitability) of industrial enterprises in Russia and contributing factors under turbulent economy and adverse external environment.
Objectives The study focuses on simulation of factors influencing the profitability of Russian, foreign and jointly owned enterprises operating in the chemical industry. We ran simulation under unstable economy for 2012–2016.
Methods The study draws on regression analysis of panel data, boxplots and analysis-of-variance methods to identify differences between groups of enterprises.
Results The boxplots and variance analysis demonstrate a decrease in return on net assets of Russian chemical industry enterprises in 2013–2015 and negative impact of debt. Regression models proved highly significant negative impact of debt capital on net profitability of assets of enterprises of all ownership forms. We revealed negative impact of a fall in exchange rate of the national currency on return on assets, which is especially true for foreign- and jointly owned enterprises. We also established similarities and differences in the impact of various factors on return on assets between the total sampling of enterprises and foreign-invested enterprises.
Conclusions The share of borrowed capital is one of the main factors affecting the profitability of chemical industry enterprises. The Federal government should channel efforts to reducing the cost of loans for businesses. Owners of foreign-invested enterprises should avoid using foreign currency loans under unstable economy of the host country, as they may cause losses during crisis periods.

Keywords: profitability, turbulent economy, foreign-invested enterprise, chemical industry, econometric modeling

References:

  1. Medvedev D.A. [Social and economic development of Russia: Finding new dynamics]. Voprosy Ekonomiki, 2016, no. 10, pp. 5–30. (In Russ.)
  2. Ermilina D.A. [Working capital of the Russian economy]. Finansovaya analitika: problemy i resheniya = Financial Analytics: Science and Experience, 2017, vol. 10, iss. 7, pp. 755–766. (In Russ.) URL: Link
  3. Krasil'nikova E.V. [Company's sustainable growth: Relation between life cycle concepts and financial and economic factors, probability simulation]. Ekonomicheskii analiz: teoriya i praktika = Economic Analysis: Theory and Practice, 2017, vol. 16, iss. 8, pp. 1400–1419. (In Russ.) URL: Link
  4. Nizamova G.Z., Rakhmangulova E.N. [State and development trends of chemical industry of the Russian Federation]. Naukovedenie, 2017, vol. 9, no. 1. (In Russ.) URL: Link
  5. Katanidi K.G. [Analysis of the balance and sustainability of the economic entities of the chemical industry]. Naukovedenie, 2017, vol. 9, no. 1. (In Russ.) URL: Link
  6. Anwar S., Sun S. Can the presence of foreign investment affect the capital structure of domestic firms? Journal of Corporate Finance, 2015, vol. 30, pp. 32–43. URL: Link
  7. Buckley P., Wang C., Clegg J. The impact of foreign ownership, local ownership and industry characteristics on spillover benefits from foreign direct investment in China. International Business Review, 2007, vol. 16, iss. 2, pp. 142–158. URL: Link
  8. Chen W. The effect of investor origin on firm performance: Domestic and foreign direct investment in the United States. Journal of International Economics, 2011, vol. 83, iss. 2, pp. 219–228. URL: Link
  9. Dachs B., Peters B. Innovation, employment growth, and foreign ownership of firms: A European perspective. Research Policy, 2014, vol. 43, iss. 1, pp. 214–232. URL: Link
  10. Jain S., Bhargava A., Bhargava A. Impact of Capital Structure on Profitability of Indian Manufacturing Firms. Asian Journal of Research in Banking and Finance, 2017, vol. 7, iss. 7, pp. 299–306. URL: Link
  11. Ajibolade S.O., Sankay O.C. Working Capital Management and Financing Decision: Synergetic Effect on Corporate Profitability. International Journal of Management, Economics and Social Sciences, 2013, vol. 2, iss. 4, pp. 233–251.
  12. Chatterjee S. The Impact of Working Capital on the Profitability: Evidence from the Indian Firms. SSRN, 2012, August 6. URL: Link
  13. Sial M.S., Chaudhry A. Relationship between Working Capital Management and Firm Profitability: Manufacturing Sector of Pakistan. SSRN, 2012, July 15. URL: Link
  14. Ngoc Vy N.T. Does Profitability affect Debt Ratio? Evidence from Vietnam Listed Firms. Journal of Finance & Economics Research, 2016, vol. 1, iss. 2, pp. 89–103. URL: Link
  15. Santosuosso P. Cost of Debt and Corporate Profitability. International Business Research, 2014, vol. 7, iss. 2. URL: Link
  16. Obrimah O.A. Private Sector Profitability and Depreciation Pressure within Managed Floating Exchange Rate Regimes: Evidence from Nigeria. SSRN, 2014, August 2. URL: Link
  17. Ahn S.K. Exchange Rate Fluctuations and Firm Profitability in Korea. KUKJE KYUNGJE YONGU, 2008, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 43–72.
  18. Marquardt D. Comment: You should standardize the predictor variables in your regression models. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 1980, vol. 75, iss. 369, pp. 87–91.
  19. Ai C., You J., Zhou Y. Estimation of fixed effects panel data partially linear additive regression models. The Econometrics Journal, 2014, vol. 17, iss. 1, pp. 83–106. URL: Link
  20. Kampstra P. Beanplot: A Boxplot Alternative for Visual Comparison of Distributions. Journal of Statistical Software, 2008, vol. 28. URL: Link

View all articles of issue

 

ISSN 2311-8725 (Online)
ISSN 2073-039X (Print)

Journal current issue

Vol. 23, Iss. 3
March 2024

Archive