+7 925 966 4690, 9am6pm (GMT+3), Monday – Friday
ИД «Финансы и кредит»

JOURNALS

  

FOR AUTHORS

  

SUBSCRIBE

    
Economic Analysis: Theory and Practice
 

Quantitative assessment of the effect of institutional environment on social responsibility of business

Vol. 15, Iss. 1, JANUARY 2016

PDF  Article PDF Version

Received: 27 November 2015

Accepted: 4 December 2015

Available online: 24 January 2016

Subject Heading: BUSINESS PERFORMANCE

JEL Classification: С51

Pages: 43-53

Babanova Yu.V. South Ural State University, Chelyabinsk, Russian Federation
uv.babanova@yandex.ru

Makarova L.I. South Ural State University, Chelyabinsk, Russian Federation
bmli@yandex.ru

Rastvorova E.P. Chelyabinsk State Pedagogical University, Chelyabinsk, Russian Federation
evgenia.makarova05@gmail.com

Importance The requirement of sustainable development directly relates to social responsibility of business. Therefore, the factor of institutional environment of business in general and assessment of the impact of institutional environment on corporate social responsibility in particular are particularly important.
Objectives The study aims to quantify the influence of institutional environment on the social responsibility of business.
Methods Using the econometric approach, we analyzed the impact of institutional environment on corporate social responsibility, and defined indicators to assess it at the macro-level.
Results We propose using indicators that evaluate the impact of institutional environment on the social responsibility of business. They include the level of property rights protection, corruption perception index, and the level of law abidance. The developed regression model enabled to quantify the impact of institutional environment on the social responsibility of business on the case of economic and political institutions.
Conclusions and Relevance We conclude that protection and specification of property rights, the level of corruption and law-abiding behavior have approximately similar influence on the development of social responsibility of business in the society.

Keywords: social responsibility, business, institutional environment, property rights

References:

  1. Carroll A.B. Corporate Social Responsibility: Evolution of Definitional Construct. Business and Society, 1999, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 268–295.
  2. Levitt T. The Dangers of Social Responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 1958, vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 41–50.
  3. Carroll A.B. The Pyramid of Corporate Social Responsibility: Toward the Moral Management of Organizational Stakeholders. Business Horizons, 1991, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 39–48.
  4. Friedman M.A. The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase its Profits. The New York Times Magazine, 1970, September 13.
  5. Schwartz M., Caroll A. Corporate Social Responsibility: A Three-Domain Approach. Business Ethics Quarterly, 2003, no. 4, pp. 503–530.
  6. Verevkin L.P. Sotsial'naya otvetstvennost' biznesa [Corporate social responsibility]. Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya = Monitoring of Public Opinion, 2010, no. 1, pp. 44–55.
  7. Blagov Yu.E., Ivanov E.A. Korporativnaya sotsial'naya otvetstvennost' v Rossii [Corporate social responsibility in Russia]. Rossiiskii zhurnal menedzhmenta = Russian Management Journal, 2009, no. 1, pp. 3–24.
  8. Blagov Yu.E. Genezis kontseptsii korporativnoi sotsial'noi otvetstvennosti [The genesis of the concept of corporate social responsibility]. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Ser. 8. = Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Series 8, 2006, vol. 2, pp. 337–415.
  9. Ostrom E.A. Teoriya ratsional'nogo vybora kollektivnogo deistviya. Bikhevioristskii podkhod. Obrashchenie prezidenta amerikanskoi politologicheskoi assotsiatsii, 1997 g [A Behavioral Approach to the Rational Choice Theory of Collective Action. Presidential Address, American Political Science Association]. Voprosy gosudarstvennogo i munitsipal'nogo upravleniya = Public Administration Issues, 2010, no. 1, pp. 5–52.
  10. Grinberg R. Ekonomicheskaya effektivnost' predprinimatel'stva i sotsial'naya otvetstvennost' firmy [Economic efficiency of business and social responsibility of the firm]. Obshchestvo i ekonomika = Society and Economics, 2006, no. 9, pp. 9–24.
  11. Burdzhalov F. Sotsial'naya sfera predpriyatiya: sovremennaya rossiiskaya praktika v mirovom kontekste [Social sphere of the enterprise: modern Russian practice in the global context]. Moscow, IMEMO Publ., 2002, 364 p.
  12. Soboleva I. Sotsial'naya otvetstvennost' biznesa: global'nyi kontekst i rossiiskie realii [Social responsibility of business: the global context and Russian realities]. Voprosy Ekonomiki, 2005, no. 10, pp. 90–102.
  13. Salimova T.A., Ol'khovikova N.B. Instrumenty sistemnoi deyatel'nosti po uluchsheniyu v oblasti sotsial'no otvetstvennogo povedeniya organizatsii [The tools of system-related work on improvements in the area of socially responsible behaviour of the organization]. Standarty i kachestvo = Standards and Quality, 2012, no. 12, pp. 74–78.
  14. Tul'chinskii G.L. Korporativnaya sotsial'naya otvetstvennost': tekhnologii i otsenka effektivnosti [Corporate social responsibility: technologies and efficiency evaluation]. Moscow, Yurait Publ., 2015, 338 p.
  15. Malinin E.D. O sotsial'noi otvetstvennosti predprinimatelei [On social responsibility of entrepreneurs]. EKO = ECO, 2000, no. 11, pp. 160–173.
  16. Belova V.L., Garsia A.L. O sotsial'noi otvetstvennosti biznesa [On social responsibility of business]. Sotsial'no-gumanitarnye znaniya = Socio-humanitarian Knowledge, 2004, no. 6, pp. 196–211.
  17. Vittenberg E.Ya. Sotsial'naya otvetstvennost' biznesa na postsovetskom prostranstve [Corporate social responsibility in the former Soviet Union]. Moscow, Russian State University for the Humanities Publ., 2011, 481 p.
  18. Zadek S., Raynard P., Oliveira C., Do Nascimento E., Tello R. Responsible Competitiveness: Reshaping Global Markets Through Responsible Business Practice. London, AccountAbility & FDC, 2005, 130 p.
  19. Oleinik A.N. Izderzhki i perspektivy reform v Rossii. Institutsional'nyi podkhod. V kn.: Istoki. Vyp. 3 [Costs and prospects for reforms in Russia. An institutional approach. In: Origins. Issue 3]. Moscow, HSE Publ., 1998, pp. 124–165.
  20. Ustoichivoe razvitie ekonomicheskikh sistem: ot teorii k praktike [Sustainable development of economic systems: from theory to practice]. Chelyabinsk, ChelSU Publ., 2014, 244 p.
  21. Kirdina S.G. Institutsional'naya struktura sovremennoi Rossii: evolyutsionnaya modernizatsiya [Institutional structure of modern Russia: evolutionary modernization]. Voprosy Ekonomiki, 2004, no. 10, pp. 89–98.
  22. Kapelyushnikov R. Ekonomicheskaya teoriya prav sobstvennosti: metodologiya, osnovnye ponyatiya, krug problem [Economic theory of property rights: methodology, key concepts, array of problems]. Moscow, IMEMO Publ., 1990, 211 p.
  23. Nort D. Instituty, institutsional'nye izmeneniya i funktsionirovanie ekonomiki [Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance (Political Economy of Institutions and Decisions)]. Moscow, Nachala Publ., 1997, 180 p.
  24. Kirdina S.G. Modeli ekonomiki v teorii institutsional'nykh matrits [Economic model in the theory of institutional matrix]. Ekonomicheskaya nauka sovremennoi Rossii = Economic Science of Modern Russia, 2007, no. 2, pp. 34–51.

View all articles of issue

 

ISSN 2311-8725 (Online)
ISSN 2073-039X (Print)

Journal current issue

Vol. 23, Iss. 3
March 2024

Archive