+7 925 966 4690, 9am6pm (GMT+3), Monday – Friday
ИД «Финансы и кредит»

JOURNALS

  

FOR AUTHORS

  

SUBSCRIBE

    
Economic Analysis: Theory and Practice
 

Formation of expectations in models with heterogeneous agents and endogenous rate of time preferences

Vol. 14, Iss. 21, JUNE 2015

PDF  Article PDF Version

Available online: 11 June 2015

Subject Heading: MATHEMATICAL METHODS AND MODELS

JEL Classification: 

Pages: 47-54

Serkov L.A. Ural Institute of Business, Yekaterinburg, Russian Federation
dsge2012@mail.ru

Importance One of the drawbacks of dynamic stochastic general equilibrium models (DSGE models) is the formation of expectations in these representative agent models with a constant rate of time preference. Therefore, it is relevant to consider the process of formation of expectations in models with heterogeneous agents and endogenous discount rate.
     Objectives The purpose of the work is to study the effect of endogenous rate of time preference on the dynamics of stochastic models with heterogeneous agents using the algorithm of formation of expectations associated with training the agents under the trail-and-error method.
     Methods Using the mathematical modeling, I investigated the effect of endogenous rate of time preference on the volatility of variables in a dynamic stochastic model with heterogeneous agents.
     Results The study delivered the results on decomposition of the variance of endogenous variables. Furthermore, I analyzed the convergence of the algorithm of expectations formation. The study shows that the availability of feedback for time preference rate reduces the volatility of variables under consideration. In addition, in models with endogenous rate of time preference, the convergence of the algorithm of expectations formation is much higher than the rate of convergence of the algorithm in models with a constant rate of time preference.
     Conclusions and Relevance The findings may be of interest to those involved in the analysis of large-scale DSGE models, which are one of the basic tools of macroeconomic analysis. The conclusion on the mechanism of expectations formation in models with heterogeneous agents may be useful for the econometric analysis of economic systems.

Keywords: heterogeneous agents, expectations, endogenous rate, time preference, trial-and-error method

References:

  1. Andreev M.Yu., Pospelov I.G. Printsip ratsional'nykh ozhidanii: obzor kontseptsii i primery modelei [The rational expectations principle: an overview of concepts and examples of models]. Moscow, Institution of RAS Dorodnicyn Computing Centre of RAS Publ., 2008, 79 p.
  2. Rudenko A. Teoriya samorazvitiya otkrytykh kataliticheskikh sistem [The theory of self-development of open catalyst systems]. Moscow, Lomonosov Moscow State University Publ., 1969, 276 p.
  3. Serkov L.A. Samoorganizatsiya ozhidanii s ogranichennoi ratsional'nost'yu kak mekhanizm samorazvitiya ekonomicheskikh sistem [Self-organization of expectations with limited rationality as a mechanism of economic systems’ self-development]. Ekonomicheskii analiz: teoriya i praktika = Economic Analysis: Theory and Practice, 2014, no. 33, pp. 49–55.
  4. Serkov L.A. Sinergeticheskie aspekty modelirovaniya sotsial'no-ekonomicheskikh protsessov [Synergistic aspects of modeling of socio-economic processes]. Yekaterinburg, Institute of Economics, Ural Branch of RAS Publ., 2008, 215 p.
  5. Aiyagari S. Uninsured Idiosyncratic Risk and Aggregate Saving. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1994, vol. 109, no. 3, pp. 659–684.
  6. Clarida R., Gali J., Gertler M. Monetary Policy Rules and Macroeconomic Stability: Evidence and Some Theory. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2000, no. 115, pp. 147–180.
  7. Den Haan W.J., Rendahl P. Solving the Incomplete Markets Model with Aggregate Uncertainty Using Explicit Aggregation. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 2010, no. 34, pp. 69–78.
  8. Evans G.W., Honkapohja S. Adaptive Learning and Monetary Policy Design. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 2003, no. 35, pp. 1045–1072.
  9. Evans G.W., Honkapohja S. Learning Dynamics. In: Handbook of Macroeconomics. Еd. by J.B. Taylor, M. Woodford. Elsevier Academic Press, 1999, vol. 1С, pp. 449–542.
  10. Evans G.W., McGough B. Monetary policy, indeterminacy and learning. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 2005, no. 29, pp. 1809–1840.
  11. Gali J., Monacelli T. Monetary Policy and Exchange Rate Volatility in a Small Open Economy. Review of Economic Studies, 2005, vol. 72, no. 3, pp. 707–734.
  12. Huggett M. The Risk-Free Rate in Heterogeneous-Agent Incomplete-Insurance Economies. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 1993, no. 17, pp. 953–969.
  13. Kim S., Kollmann R., Kim J. Solving the Incomplete Markets Model with Aggregate Uncertainty Using a Perturbation Method. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 2010, no. 34, pp. 50–58.
  14. Krusell P., Smith A.A. Income and Wealth Heterogeneity in the Macroeconomy. Journal of Political Economy, 1998, no. 106, pp. 867–896.
  15. Krusell P., Smith A.A. Income and Wealth Heterogeneity, Portfolio Choice, and Equilibrium Asset Returns. Macroeconomic Dynamics, 1997, no. 1, pp. 387–422.
  16. Kydland F., Prescott E.C. Time to build and aggregate fluctuations. Econometrica, 1982, no. 50, pp. 1345–1370.
  17. Maliar L., Maliar S., Valli F. Solving the Incomplete Markets Model with Aggregate Uncertainty Using the Krusell – Smith Algorithm. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 2010, no. 34, pp. 42–49.
  18. Monacelli T. Into the Mussa Puzzle: Monetary Policy Regimes and the Real Exchange Rate in a Small Open Economy. Journal of International Economics, 2004, no. 62, pp. 191–217.
  19. Schmitt-Grohe S. Closing Small Open Economy Models. NBER Working Paper, 2002, no. 9270, pp. 1–19.
  20. Schmitt-Grohe S., Uribe M. Solving dynamic general equilibrium models using a second-order approximation to the policy function. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 2004, no. 28, pp. 755–775.
  21. Slobodyan S., Wouters R. Learning in a Medium-Scale DSGE Model with Expectations Based on Small Forecasting Models. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 2012, vol. 4, iss. 2, pp. 65–101.

View all articles of issue

 

ISSN 2311-8725 (Online)
ISSN 2073-039X (Print)

Journal current issue

Vol. 23, Iss. 3
March 2024

Archive