+7 925 966 4690, 9am6pm (GMT+3), Monday – Friday
ИД «Финансы и кредит»

JOURNALS

  

FOR AUTHORS

  

SUBSCRIBE

    
Economic Analysis: Theory and Practice
 

Evaluation of socially significant projects supported by Federal authorities: methodological issues and ways of improvement

Vol. 14, Iss. 6, FEBRUARY 2015

PDF  Article PDF Version

Available online: 8 February 2015

Subject Heading: METHODS OF ANALYSIS

JEL Classification: 

Pages: 9-19

Mel'nikov R.M. Institute of Public Administration and Management under Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, Moscow, Russian Federation
rmmel@mail.ru

Importance The article reviews techniques used for selection of projects for subsidizing and co-financing by the Russian public sector. I compare the domestic and international experience, especially the World Bank and the European Commission experience.
     Objectives The paper demonstrates that the Russian methodology of comprehensive analysis of economic (public) efficiency is insufficiently elaborated. The article identifies the specifics of the Russian decision-making practices, consisting in the provision of State support for commercially viable projects that could be financed on market terms.
     Methods I evaluate the methodological approaches developed by the Ministry of Industry and Trade of the Russian Federation for selection of industrial projects for seeking interest rate subsidies for servicing investment loans, and by the Ministry of Economic Development of the Russian Federation for selection of projects seeking funding at the expense of the National Welfare Fund resources. I reveal problematic aspects of the considered methodologies, which create prerequisites for subjective decision making and prioritized consideration of interests of the large State corporations with strong administrative potential in relation to the most effective use of limited public sector resources for socio-economic development of the country and overcoming the negative consequences of the crisis on a scale of national economy.
     Results The paper emphasizes insufficient attention to the consideration of the probability of redundancy of the State support in assessing the budgetary efficiency of projects, the need for greater refinement and adaptation of methodological approaches to the assessment of the economic (social) efficiency taken from previously developed domestic and foreign techniques, which have different scope of application, the lack of clear rules of the evaluation of criteria for financial, fiscal and economic performance and resilience to risks while carrying out competitive selection of projects for the State support provision.
     Conclusions and Relevance I make recommendations for improving the methodological approaches to project selection for subsidizing and co-financing by the Russian federal authorities based on international experience.

Keywords: socially significant projects, State support, business, cost-benefit analysis, projects fiscal efficiency, projects economic efficiency

References:

  1. Arkhipov V.M., Emel'yanov A.M. Otsenka sotsial'noi stavki diskontirovaniya [Evaluating the social discounting rate]. Finansy i kredit = Finance and credit, 2006, no. 17, pp. 49–55.
  2. Behrens W., Hawranek P.M. Rukovodstvo po otsenke effektivnosti investitsii [Manual for the Preparation of Industrial Feasibility Studies]. Moscow, INFRA-M Publ., 1995, 528 p.
  3. Vilenskii P.L., Livshits V.N., Smolyak S.A. Otsenka effektivnosti investitsionnykh proektov [Evaluating the efficiency of investment projects]. Moscow, Delo Publ., 2004, 888 p.
  4. Vilenskii P.L., Livshits V.N., Smolyak S.A., Shakhnazarov A.G. O metodike otsenki effektivnosti real'nykh investitsionnykh proektov [On methodology of the evaluation of real investment projects’ efficiency]. Rossiiskii ekonomicheskii zhurnal = Russian Economic Journal, 2006, no. 9-10, pp. 63–73.
  5. Livshits V., Shvetsov A. Kakikh oshibok sleduet izbegat' pri otsenke investitsionnykh proektov s uchastiem gosudarstva [What kind of mistakes must be avoided while evaluating investment projects with public sector participation]. Voprosy Economiki, 2011, no. 9, pp. 80–92.
  6. Margolin A.M. Kriterii effektivnosti pri realizatsii gosudarstvennykh programm [The efficiency criteria when implementing governmental programs]. Gosudarstvennaya sluzhba = Public administration, 2013, no. 2, pp. 22–27.
  7. Metodicheskie rekomendatsii po otsenke effektivnosti investitsionnykh proektov (vtoraya redaktsiya) [Methodological recommendations on the evaluation of investment projects’ efficiency (second edition)]. Moscow, Ekonomika Publ., 2000, 421 p.
  8. Novikova T.S. Analiz obshchestvennoi effektivnosti investitsionnykh proektov [An analysis of public efficiency of investment projects]. Novosibirsk, IEOIP Publ., 2005, 282 p.
  9. Novikova T.S. Vzaimosvyaz' gosudarstvennykh finansov i finansov predpriyatii: analiz obshchestvennoi effektivnosti investitsionnykh proektov [Interaction between public finance and corporate finance: an analysis of public efficiency of investment projects]. Region: ekonomika i sotsiologiya = Region: economics and sociology, 2005, no. 2, pp. 171–184.
  10. Polterovich V., Popov V. Evolyutsionnaya teoriya ekonomicheskoi politiki. Chast' I. Opyt bystrogo razvitiya [The evolution theory of economic policy. Part I. Experience of fast development]. Voprosy Economiki, 2006, no. 7, pp. 4–23.
  11. Ramsey F. Matematicheskaya teoriya sberezhenii [A mathematical theory of savings]. Economic Journal, 1928, vol. 38, no. 152.
  12. Sheluntsova M.A. Otsenka diapazona znachenii sotsial'noi stavki diskontirovaniya dlya razlichnykh sfer obshchestvennogo sektora ekonomiki [Evaluation of the social discount rate ranges for various subsectors of public sector of economy]. Ekonomicheskii analiz: teoriya i praktika = Economic analysis: theory and practice, 2010, no. 42, pp. 34–40.
  13. Sheluntsova M.A. Problemnye voprosy analiza izderzhek i vygod v obshchestvennom sektore ekonomiki [Topical issues of cost-benefit analysis in public sector of economy]. Problemy sovremennoi ekonomiki = Problems of Modern Economics, 2010, no. 3, pp. 237–240.
  14. Belli P., Anderson J.R., Barnum H.N., Dixon J.A., Tan J-P. Economic Analysis. Analytical Tools and Practical Applications. Washington D.C., World Bank, 2001.
  15. Boardman A.E., Greenberg D.H., Vining A.R., Weimer D.L. Cost-Benefit Analysis. Concepts and Practice. Boston, Prentice Hall, 2012.
  16. Gramlich E.M. Cost-Benefit Analysis of Governmental Programs. USA, New Jersey, Prentice -Hall, 1981.
  17. Guide to Cost-Benefit Analysis of Investment Projects. European Commission Directorate General Regional Policy. Brussels, 2008.
  18. Honohan P. Key Issues of Cost-Benefit Methodology for Irish Industrial Policy. Dublin, General Research Series, 1998.
  19. Jenkins G., Kuo C., Harberger A. Cost-Benefit Analysis for Investment Decisions. Kingston, Queen’s University Press, 2011.
  20. Little I., Mirrlees J. Project Appraisal and Planning for Developing Countries. London, Heinemann, 1974.
  21. Murphy A., Walsh B., Barry F. The Economic Appraisal System for Projects Seeking Support from the Industrial Development Agencies. Dublin, Forfas, 2003.
  22. Squire L., van der Tak H. Development Planning and Policy Analysis Syllabus. Baltimore, John Hopkins University Press, 1975.

View all articles of issue

 

ISSN 2311-8725 (Online)
ISSN 2073-039X (Print)

Journal current issue

Vol. 23, Iss. 3
March 2024

Archive